RESPOND TO CLASSMATE RESPONSE OF DISCUSSION AND GIVE POSITIVE FEEDBACK A stateme

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable ratesFor This or a Similar Paper Click To Order NowRESPOND TO CLASSMATE RESPONSE OF DISCUSSION AND GIVE POSITIVE FEEDBACKA statement made by a suspect can be used as substantive evidence in a trial as long as the person who made the statement is present for the trial and either testifies or is cross-examined. The approach lends a hand in establishing the statement’s credibility. In other words, the judges can rely on it when they make their decision. It differs from its use to impeach a suspect’s testimony at a trial because it is suppressed in this instance (Stein, 2021). Suppression of evidence means that it cannot be used as substantive evidence. To begin with, it’s possible that material was obtained illegally or under coercion.In the event that a statement contravenes even one of these provisions, it will be suppressed from the evidence.When it comes to impeachment, the jury is aware of how a statement that was previously withheld can be used. This is due to the fact that certain exceptions make it possible to use such evidence throughout the process of cross-examining the suspect (Stein, 2021). To intentionally contradict some aspects of the suspect’s statement is one of the goals here.When the statement is used in a trial to impeach the suspect, the jury is aware that it is being used to prove the defendant’s credibility and not as proof that the suspect is guilty.Statements collected illegally do not prevent a defendant from exercising a constitutional right during trial. This is because the evidence can be excluded on the grounds that it was illegally obtained (Stein, 2021). It indicates that the defendant has the right to testify prior to trial.However, even if there are legitimate grounds for withholding the material, it must be noted that it can still be used to discredit his testimony during cross-examination. In addition, even if the illegally obtained statement is admissible, the defendant must be compelled to testify prior to the trial.ReferencesStein G. (2021). DON’T OPEN THE DOOR – Keeping Suppressed Evidence Out! Retrieved from https://www.theduilawyer.com/do-not-open-the-door-keeping-suppressed-evidence- out/ANSWER MODULE 7 DISCUSSION QUESTION There has been much discussion among legal scholars, defense attorneys, and prosecutors as to the reliability of eye witness identification. What is your position on the weight a jury should place on eye witness identification? Defend your position. What does current research say as to the reliability of these witnesses?USE SCHOLARLY SOURCES TO PROVE YOUR POINT.For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order NowRelated