Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable ratesFor This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now**BOOK IS ATTACHETED AS PDF** PLEASE DO NOT DO YOUR OWN BOOK!!!!!!Upper left corner: Name, Course & Section/Professor/Dateo Begin with bibliographic information for your chosen book (See example below)o 1 inch marginso 12 point font, Times New Roman or similar fonto Double-spacedo Quotations –§ At least 2, no more than 5.§ No longer than 2 lines of text.§ Footnote in Turabian or Chicago style. OR In-Text Citations (MLA or APA)EvaluationThis should be a commentary, not just a summary of the book – it is a review, not a report. Answer the following sections within the paper. Your paper need not be organized in this specific manner, but I will be looking for these ideas within your writing. Please do not write a list of answers to these questions. Write a persuasive review of the book.Summary of the book – 30% of reviewOverview of the historiographical problemWhat other writers have dealt w/ the problem?What conclusions did they draw?Is this book shifting the discussion?Overview of the author’s careerAffiliations, biases, point of viewOther booksDoes this book develop earlier thoughts?Radical shift?Was the work and author reliable?Describe the aim and purposeAnalyze the argument – 70% of reviewRelate the author’s thesis.How does the argument prove the thesis to be true?Is the argument convincing? Why or why not?Strengths of ArgumentBe specific and substantiveWhat are most original and important characteristics?How does it build specifically, on earlier writings?In what ways might it force scholars to rethink older ideas and traditional arguments?Is the book well written? Easy to follow and read? If not, why?Are the facts well presented? Do they conflict? Are they appropriateWeaknesses of Argument.Is it written against a particular school of thought, person, or book?What are the holes in the argumentHas anything been ignored or left out?Evaluate the evidenceHow well does the evidence support the argument?Is counter-evidence noted? (That is, every secondary source is an interpretation, is this point well made?)ReactionsWhat struck you as noteworthyWas the book effective and persuasive? (Did the thesis convince you?)How did this book enhance your understanding of the topic?Does the book contribute to your understanding of the subject? Is it worthwhile for students of history to read? Why or why not?For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order NowRelated