22734167.

The Best WritersCOPYRIGHT POST UNIVERSITY 2021 ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDDue Date: 11:59 p.m. Sunday of Unit 2 Points: 100Overview: This week, we talked about the impact culture and ethics can have on individual and organizational performance. For this assignment, you will analyze an individual who is faced with a moral dilemma in a movie.Instructions:• Select a movie from the Movie Choice List found in this week’s Readings andResources.• Research several ethical frameworks.o Use your readings from this week to help you select a framework and do amore in-depth study of that framework.• Select one framework as a basis for your decision.• Analyze the situation or individual in the movie using the chosen framework.• Discuss the framework, your decision, and how it fits the ethical framework youused for your decision.Requirements:• Develop a clear introduction with a thesis, a body, and a conclusion. Focus onquality of writing, as opposed to length.• Research and include at least one additional, credible reference from an outsidesource pertaining to the leader you chose.• Use APA formatting for the cover page, citations, and the reference page. Noabstract is required.Be sure to read the criteria by which your work will be evaluated before you write and again after you write.MGT203 Foundations of LeadershipUnit 2 Assignment: Moral Dilemmas Choosing Between Two RightsCOPYRIGHT POST UNIVERSITY 2021 ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDEvaluation Rubric for Unit 2 AssignmentCRITERIA Deficient Needs ImprovementProficient Exemplary(0-12 points) (13-19 points) (20-25 points) (26-30 points)Supporting Evidence/ AnalysisLacks specific, credible, and relevant support. Development of position / argument is inadequate or missing.There is evidence of some support in the paper, but it is not tied in well with the development of the position or argument.Adequately supported with a limited spectrum of specific, credible, and relevant evidence. Development of position or argument is thoughtful and persuasive but lacks some detail.Well-supported with a broad spectrum of specific, credible, and relevant evidence. Position / argument is well-developed, very thoughtful, and persuasive.(0-9 points) (10-14 points) (15-17 points) (18-20 points)Grammar and MechanicsLacks polish and does not demonstrate proficiency in grammar and mechanics.Some polish and proficiency in grammar and mechanics is present.Generally polished and demonstrates proficiency in grammar and mechanics.Polished and demonstrates a high level of proficiency in grammar and mechanics.(0-7 points) (8-10 points) (11-13 points) (14-15 points)Introduction and Thesis StatementUnclear or incompleteIntroduction and thesis are present but lack detail and clarity.Introduction with a partially developed thesis.Clear, well-developed, introduction and thesis.Conclusion No conclusion included.Conclusion is present but does not tie in with the rest of the paper.Some attempt at a conclusion, but it is not well written.Well-written and fully developed conclusion.(0-4 points) (5-6 points) (7-8 points) (9-10 points)Clarity and OrganizationLack organization, logic, and clarity. Transitions seldom or neverOrganization, logic and/or clarity are missing. Transitions are used but areGenerally organized, logical, and clearly articulated. TransitionsParagraph formation is clear. Fully organized, logical and clearlyCOPYRIGHT POST UNIVERSITY 2021 ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDused to connect ideas.confusing and difficult to follow.often smoothly connect ideas.articulated. Transitions smoothly connect ideas.APA FormattingPaper has no APA formatting and contains no credible references.There is some attempt at APA formatting in the paper, but it is not correctly used. One credible reference is used.Paper lacks one element of APA (cover, references or in-text citations), but does contain one credible reference.Paper has all elements of APA formatting used properly with at least one credible reference used.